Extreme Liberal's Blog

Where Liberalism Is Alive and Well!

Creating Change From Within – A History Lesson For Progressives!

Guest Blogger: theangryliberal

“Everything I did in my life that was worthwhile, I caught hell for.”

~Earl Warren

Our Big Mistake!

That sounds like a Lyle Lovett song, Our Big Mistake; we are repeating it over and over and over again, from the 1968 election to the present. Isn’t it sort of sad, we gave up working from the inside to continue to move government in a more progressive way?

  1. We turn on each other at the drop of a hat
  2. We keep our eye off the prize, remember this is ultimately about so much  more than one guy

Republicans currently seem to have a real death wish for the country! They will basically do anything to make sure this President is unable to function properly as the Chief Executive.  Certainly this demonstrates the power Grover Norquist has over Republican politicians. What is up with that? How is it these guys get away with this behavior. The whole debt ceiling debacle, can you imagine the outrage of the press and others if Democrats had held the entire country hostage like that? No, I don’t think so.  On the other hand the Hamsher, L. Ron Greenwald faux progressives fight over who could be the leader of Shangri La., a leader for all, the liberal John Galt, the one who always makes good decisions, the man who never fails, the genius who saves us from ourselves. But he never requires we participate in saving ourselves, he does that on his own. So while the Hamsherwalds wait for their more perfect leader and the Republicans follow the Norquist lead, the country trudges on, while we struggle to maintain our optimism. But I am going to put this out there, why aren’t liberals/progressives working together to gain a foothold in government so more progressive legislation can be enacted at the federal level.

The extreme left is making a big mistake constantly making Barack Obama the issue and not Republican policies which are literally ruining the country.  How do we change the balance of power in the government?

There are few people more colorful in modern American history as Harold LeClair Ickes.  A man of America, he loved politics, and in his time he was a member of the Republican Party, the Progressive Party and ultimately became not just a member of the Democratic Party but was the longest serving Secretary of the Interior under Franklin Delano Roosevelt. From his perch he saw the rise and fall of the Progressive Party. His experience should give current progressives pause, because he offers clues to how to be an effective party in his critique of the Progressive Party of 1912.

Ickes was a young man in 1912, born in 1874; he’d begun his political life as a Republican. However, when Teddy Roosevelt changed parties, Harold Ickes changed parties. He was a Roosevelt republican, he believed in reform and he didn’t see W. H. Taft as a reformer. So Ickes promptly moved from the Republican Party to the newly formed Bull Moose Party, also known as the Progressive Party.

And so began a tumultuous time in the history of American politics.

By 1912, the progressive wing of the Republican Party had completely peeled off and begun their own party. It was ironically called, “A Contract with the People”. Wow who knew Newt Gingrich stole his Contract with/on America from some former disgruntled Republicans! I certainly did not know this.

The Platform:

The social platform is more than interesting, so here is a small excerpt of their platform:

  • A National Health Service to include all existing government medical agencies.
  • Social Insurance: which would provide for the elderly, the unemployed and the disabled.
  • Limited injunctions in strikes.
  • A minimum wage law for women
  • An eight hour workday
  • A federal securities commission
  • Farm relief.
  •  Workers’ Compensation for work-related injuries.
  • An inheritance tax.
  • A Constitutional Amendment to allow a Federal income tax.

The political reforms proposed included

  • Women’s suffrage.
  • Direct election of Senators.
  •  Primary elections for state and federal nominations.

Sound familiar? Yes it sounds like the New Deal!  Let’s just say the Gilded Aged suffered from many of the same issues America suffers from today, income inequality being a prime source of discontent, and as social nets are whittled down, there will be more discontent in the future. This was a time when Progressive could have had much impact on society and they could today too, but it takes organization and work, not just blogs bitching and moaning about the awfulness of everything.

Progressives didn’t have a big impact until Franklin Delano Roosevelt came into power. The Gilded Age, yes, there are many good comparisons to today. The Gilded Age in the US is marked by having the wealthiest congressional members, just like today.

Progressives today are failing in the same way independent progressive movements failed in the past; Ickes work “Who Killed the Progressive Party” gives us insight into those failures. Ickes point was the failure of the Progressive Party came down to one man, but it was so much more than that, through Ickes work we can see the ultimate failure in these words:

“The Progressive party contained few practical politicians in its ranks. The rank and file did not know how parties were run. They were blindly following Theodore Roosevelt, and they were not concerned about what machinery was necessary or how it was to be used. ” (Ickes, Who Killed the Progressive Party 309) Well, our failure as Democrats and people who call themselves Progressives has been the failure to understand how parties and governments are run. It is within our best interest to understand how policies are made and implemented and to participate in order to be heard. Yes people are heard with their votes, but the failure to participate deeply by getting people elected and representing all levels of government is the only way to significantly change government policies.

By 1916, the Progressive Party was essentially dead.  It did not have any initial impact other than to break apart the Republican Party. I would hate to see Democrats, liberals, progressives, go this route.  Some progressive ideals did manifest in the next Roosevelt Administration, because it is here where people like Harold Ickes came to change America, and they did it by working from within the government. These participants were able to change the trajectory of laissez faire policies and help institute policies that benefited the working class of America.  Ickes himself was most successful in advancing progressivism when he was participating in the government as a man off all things to Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Ickes held several posts simultaneously in the Roosevelt Administration, most famously of course, as the Secretary of the Interior — a position he held from 1933 – 1946.  No doubt nothing like this can ever happen again, but it is an example of how to help craft big policies, and that is to get more progressives into government. My contention is, it should be done on a micro level as well as a macro level, i.e. the PTA and school boards are just as important as county, city, and state government. But I digress, Ickes was not just the Secretary of the Interior, in 1941 President Roosevelt appointed him the Petroleum Coordinator for National Defense (Ickes, Fightin’ Oil vii).  In fact he wrote a book called Fightin’ Oil based on his experience regulating oil companies. According to Ickes the Presidents objectives were stated clearly that his office was to; “make petroleum and petroleum products available, adequately and continuously, in the proper forms at the proper places …. to satisfy military and civilian needs (Ickes, Fightin’ Oil viii). ”

Here is the interesting passage from Ickes introduction:

There were two ways in which I might have approached the job. I could have said to the President: “Mr. President, you have given me a bunch of tough hombres to deal with, and the only way that I can get along with them is for you to give me dictatorial power so that I can tell them what to do, and see that they do it. That would have been Hitler’s way. In fact some people, including, I suspect, a good many oil men themselves, thought that it would be my way, too. But I fooled them. It just so happens, that in spite of contrary opinions here and there, I believe in the American system of free enterprise. It is also the fact that I believe that business can best do its part – in peace as in war – with the least possible direction, and with the least interference, by the Government.” (Ickes, Fightin’ Oil)

The point is, Ickes and progressivism had great impact because he and others like him worked from within the system to implement progressive policies and to defend those policies to the public. Ickes was an equally controversial Secretary of the Interior.

Right now, we, progressive and democrats, are fighting each other, and when we do that, like the former progressives did, we lose. We’ve lost ground for more than 30 years by giving up control of our power within the government, have you spoken to a federal employee lately? Have you heard the things they say  about the federal government…. But they work for the federal government!!!!! Oh man, I do plenty.  So don’t we need to be applying for those positions?  If you want people to think the government can do great things don’t the people who are employed their need to believe in the system too? Republicans have done a fantastic job of appointing their friends to positions of power in the federal government, in turn they hire more conservative employees, how else could someone like Michelle Bachmann work for the IRS? If we aren’t pro-active – an attempt to infiltrate the government – our policies will never be implemented on a large scale.  Changing the system means participating in the system, and every single time we fail to do that, we lose ground to the Norquist crowd and we allow their message to become more powerful.

In short, we have to quit fighting with each other and we need to put our head down and work together. The President is just one guy, and he only serves for a short time, changes come from long term concerted efforts. If people want to see progressive change they must, must participate in the system.

Bibliography

Ickes, Harold L. Fightin’ Oil. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1943.

—. The Autobiography of a Curmudgeon. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1943.

—. “Who Killed the Progressive Party.” The American Historical Review 46.2 (1941): 306-337.

Watkins, T. H. Righteous Pilgrim: The Life and Times of Harold L. Ickes 1874 – 1952. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1990.

About these ads

August 15, 2011 - Posted by | Democratic Party, Election, Politics, President Barack Obama

9 Comments »

  1. Loved this article! I believe that your right about this but alas no matter how much you try to talk to a lot of these progressives idealogues seem to not have a clue when it comes to rationalizing this thing through. Its a damn shame because it could jeopardize not just Obama but the entire progressive movement for a long time yet.

    Comment by Jeff | August 15, 2011 | Reply

  2. Great piece Angry! You do a good job of providing perspective. People criticized his heatlhcare bill for only covering 32 million-still leaving 21 million without insurance-but they forget that FDR’s original SS only applied to a small part of the country.

    AHA can and will be improved on-providing we ignore the firebaggers and re-elect Obama in 2012 and give him a congress he can actually work with.

    http://diaryofarepublicanhater.blogspot.com/2011/08/perry-miracle-in-texas.html

    Comment by Mike L Sax | August 15, 2011 | Reply

    • I’m worried that Perry or Romney but especially Perry getting elected on the white house. Its scaring me with another idiot from Texas running for office.

      Comment by Jeff | August 15, 2011 | Reply

      • Perry only won his first election with 38% of the vote and is not as popular here as many think as we know him too well. The Texas Democratic Party has just released this video showing what a big liar Perry was last year when he said he would NOT quit the job (like a Sarah Palin) and would fulfill a FOUR year term, not forsaking Texans to run for president.

        Comment by grantinhouston | August 15, 2011 | Reply

        • why does Perry sound so similiar to Bush? I mean they even have the same accent and everything!

          Comment by Jeff | August 15, 2011 | Reply

          • I think their accents are purposefully affected to some degree to appeal to a redneck voter. George, born in Connecticut, spending his summers growing up in Maine, attending the tony Kinkaid School in Houston then Phillips Academy for high school in Massachusetts, then more years at Yale and Harvard, he should not have much of a Texas accent. After all, nobody else in the Bush family has one. Rick Perry, who was raised on a Texas farm near Abilene and attended A&M has more credibility but I have heard him speak at times without having much of a dialect. However, today in Iowa, he really poured it on thickly!

            A majority of Texans today are from somewhere else and even my many Texas born-and-raised nieces and nephews here speak without any accent. The Texas accent isn’t hard to affect, just talk a bit slower, more nasally, make some one syllable words…two, and if you want to sound like you’re from the Panhandle or North Central Texas, pronounce your “long a’s like long i’s”…e.g., the name Dave becomes Dive! There are East Texas accents, South Texas accents, West Texas accents, so there is more than one sound here. I can often pick up on where in our very large state (nearly 900 miles across) someone may hail from. East Texas is the most pronounced “southern” (think Lady Bird Johnson).

            But pepper your speech with some y’all’s, perty gud for pretty good, raht for right, naht for night, paap for pipe, melk for milk, etc. and you too can sound like a “Texan” and run for political office.

            Comment by grantinhouston | August 16, 2011 | Reply

  3. How is it these guys get away with this behavior. The whole debt ceiling debacle, can you imagine the outrage of the press and others if Democrats had held the entire country hostage like that? No, I don’t think so.

    I disagree; that is exactly how the 111th Congress passed The Affordable Care Act. Both sides play that game.

    Comment by Chicken Hammer | August 16, 2011 | Reply

  4. AAhh well I think that this country deserves someone like Rick Perry seeing how they’ve treated Obama with such flamboyant disrespect.

    Comment by Jeff | August 16, 2011 | Reply

  5. Right on and well put! Sometimes Liberals and Democrats are their own worst enemies. We need to start working together and stop this insane ‘he didn’t do it EXACTLY the way I wanted him to and it broke my heart’ thing. The Republicans revel in this and encourage it every chance they get. We need to collectively begin working on the movie ‘Guess Who’s Coming to the White House – Part II’.

    Comment by M. H. Colbert | August 16, 2011 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 152 other followers

%d bloggers like this: